While I think the swine flu outbreak should be a concern, I the media is blowing the whole thing out of proportions. They love "fear journalism" because it gets ratings. The conspiracist in me wonders if Purell and Lysol are secretly paying the media to overstate things. As a result, people aren't thinking rationally. Countries such as China and Russia, for example, have banned pork imports from the US and Mexico. However, the flu is being spread from human-to-human contact and is a mutated form of "swine flu", which can not be contracted from eating pig meat. As a result, the CDC has started referring to it's technical name, "H1N1 Flu". Don't bet on seeing that name in the headlines anytime soon. I think this is a good reminder to use proper hygiene, but people need to not overreact. Remember how we were all going to die from bird flu??
In other swine news, now that the book on A-Rod* has come out, we now learn that he tipped pitches while playing for the Rangers. Ok, why the hell would he do that? Apparently, in blowout games, he would signal pitch types to opposing middle infielders so he could benefit from quid pro quo (yes, I stole that phrase from the article, but I love that phrase). He would allegedly do this to get himself out of a slump and improve his numbers. Everyone would agree that using steroids is much worse than this in a legal and historical sense and would have a much greater affect on the game of baseball. However, I think this makes him look much worse as a teammate than steroids. He is basically saying "I don't care about my pitcher, I just want to help myself".
*Note: I do not advocate hugging or being kind to A-Rod.
Thursday, April 30, 2009
Monday, April 20, 2009
The return of hockey?
I have watched at least 1 period in 5 games so far: Wings/Jackets Game 1, Rangers/Caps Game 2, Flyers/Penguins Game 3, Canucks/Blues Game 3, and Rangers/Caps Game 3. I have really enjoyed what I have seen - so much so that I am wondering if hockey is beginning to make it's comeback. The first step will require turning some of the casual hockey fans into avid fans and resparking the interest in former NHL fans. The three things that are most important to gaining attention include developing stars that fans can identify with, creating great rivalries, and improving the game action.
In terms of stars, you're probably thinking I'm referring to obvious - Sidney Crosby and Alexander Ovechkin. While they receive the most attention and probably bring more fans to away games than other teams, I think the production of local stars is more important. In Columbus, we have Rick Nash. Atlanta has Ilya Kovalchuk. While a few top stars are great for marketing purposes, fans need a local star to get behind. I feel like the coverage of the NHL is starting to bring out more of these guys.
These playoffs already have a number of games between neighbor rivals. Flyers/Penguins. Sharks/Ducks. And in my completely biased opinion, I think the Blue Jackets will become the Redwings' new rival. We play each other a lot each season, the CBJs are on their way up, and we have the whole Michigan/Ohio thing going. The Wings are the Jackets' biggest rival - we'll see if the opposite becomes true in the next few seasons.
Finally, the action I have seen so far has been fairly exciting mostly due to the post-lockout rule changes (especially the elimination of the two-line pass rule). I'm not sure if the scoring average has increased, but that doesn't matter. The "oh my god I can't believe that didn't go in" shots are just as exciting. The first period of Wings/Jackets Game 1 was very intense, probably the best period of any of the games I have seen, and the score at the end was 0-0.
By the way, don't count out the Blue Jackets! They are an inexperienced team with a young goalie. Confidence is everything to them. In my opinion, Columbus seems to be very excited to see playoff hockey for the first time. If they are able to build confidence from the fans and have a chance to score first, they could turn the series around. Keep in mind a few things: according to home ice advantange, the Blue Jackets haven't lost a game they shouldn't have won yet, the Flyers turned their series around by beating the Penguins 6-3 at home in Game 3, Steve Mason had the most shutouts this season (10), and Rick Nash can create plays better than perhaps anyone on the Redwings. HOWEVER, don't forget I am still a Redwings fan!
Most intense series: Flyers vs. Penguins - they are fighting almost the entire time. There have been some big hits and the players are getting chippy. They have one of the most heated rivalries in the game right now, as evidenced by last year's Eastern Finals.
Best Power Play: Vancouver Canucks - During the season, they were only 17th in the league in PP%. They were able to set up perfectly on each powerplay I saw and turned it into a shooting gallery. They had 1-2 guys own the space in front of the goalie and the other 3-4 cycled the puck freely until they were able to take the right shot. They ended up scoring all 3 goals in Game 3 on the powerplay
Best Passing: Detroit Redwings - I used to hate that the Redwings would always have to play finesse hockey and score pretty goals. We would get beat by tougher teams that would throw the puck at the net and jam it in. Our players now can maneuver the puck up the rink quicker than any other I've seen thanks to the two line pass rule changes. I also like seeing them create space by skating with a defender and stopping on a dime like a basketball player. Our success will hinge on whether Osgood can stay impressive and keep it together.
Most Questionable Decision: Washington Capitals - pulling Jose Theodore after Game 1. It seemed like a very risky move to pull him after 1 game in favor of a rookie. While Simeon Varlamov stopped all but 1 shot, it seems to me like it sends a message of desperation to the players. Seeing his performance in Game 2 and so far in Game 3, it looks like it may have paid off.
Best Goalie: Henrik Lundqvist - During the season, he was 4th in Wins and 11th in GAA. He looks very confident and the Rangers' success depends on their goalie more than almost any other team. The numbers would argue Luongo, but I didn't have a chance to see him make any impressive saves. His numbers for Game 3 are bad, but they aren't giving him a chance. He faced almost 30 shots through 2 periods and Sean Avery has "Sheed Syndrome" and can't stop getting penalties.
This is how I would like to see the rest of the playoffs go. Keep in mind, these are not predictions - just what I would like to see happen.
Eastern Conference
1.Boston Bruins def. 8.Montreal Canadiens
7.NY Rangers def. 2.Washington Capitals
3.NJ Devils def. 6.Carolina Hurricanes
4.Pittsburgh Penguins def. 5.Philadelphia Flyers
7.NY Rangers def. 1.Boston Bruins
This would be a great series - not just because of the Boston/New York matchup. I would love to see Sean Avery vs. Milan Lucic - both are aggressive and have occasionally thrown a cheap shot or two. I think there would a ton of great hits and fights.
4.Pittsburgh Penguins def. 3.NJ Devils
Crosby vs. Brodeur could be somewhat interesting. I don't really like the Devils nor do I like to root against them.
7.NY Rangers def. 4.Pittsburgh Penguins
I said sometime after the lockout that a NY/Detroit Stanley Cup Finals would bring a lot of attention to the game. I wouldn't mind watching a rematch from last year, but I would prefer to see someone else.
Western Conference
1.SJ Sharks def. 8.Anaheim Ducks
2.Detroit Redwings def. 7.Columbus Blue Jackets
3.Vancouver Canucks def. 6.St Louis Blues
4.Chicago Blackhawks def. 5.Calgary Flames
4.Chicago Blackhawks def. 1.SJ Sharks
I would only be rooting for Chicago because I don't want to see us having to play across the country for a second series in a row. We've had to do that in past years, and it has caught up with us. Plus, the Eastern Conference teams have an unfair advantage since they are all much closer geographically.
2.Detroit Redwings def. 3. Vancouver Canucks
Luongo is dangerous, but it appears they will lock up their first round very shortly. Could they be rusty? I hope we would lock this one up in 5 so we only have to make 1 trip to Vancouver.
2.Detroit Redwings def. 4.Chicago Blackhawks
A fitting rematch of the Winter Classic. I don't really think the Blackhawks stand a chance of seeing the Conference Finals except on TV.
Stanley Cup Finals: Wings over Rangers, just like I asked for a season or two ago. We have a villian to hate (Avery) and a matchup of two of the larger franchise bases in the sport.
In terms of stars, you're probably thinking I'm referring to obvious - Sidney Crosby and Alexander Ovechkin. While they receive the most attention and probably bring more fans to away games than other teams, I think the production of local stars is more important. In Columbus, we have Rick Nash. Atlanta has Ilya Kovalchuk. While a few top stars are great for marketing purposes, fans need a local star to get behind. I feel like the coverage of the NHL is starting to bring out more of these guys.
These playoffs already have a number of games between neighbor rivals. Flyers/Penguins. Sharks/Ducks. And in my completely biased opinion, I think the Blue Jackets will become the Redwings' new rival. We play each other a lot each season, the CBJs are on their way up, and we have the whole Michigan/Ohio thing going. The Wings are the Jackets' biggest rival - we'll see if the opposite becomes true in the next few seasons.
Finally, the action I have seen so far has been fairly exciting mostly due to the post-lockout rule changes (especially the elimination of the two-line pass rule). I'm not sure if the scoring average has increased, but that doesn't matter. The "oh my god I can't believe that didn't go in" shots are just as exciting. The first period of Wings/Jackets Game 1 was very intense, probably the best period of any of the games I have seen, and the score at the end was 0-0.
By the way, don't count out the Blue Jackets! They are an inexperienced team with a young goalie. Confidence is everything to them. In my opinion, Columbus seems to be very excited to see playoff hockey for the first time. If they are able to build confidence from the fans and have a chance to score first, they could turn the series around. Keep in mind a few things: according to home ice advantange, the Blue Jackets haven't lost a game they shouldn't have won yet, the Flyers turned their series around by beating the Penguins 6-3 at home in Game 3, Steve Mason had the most shutouts this season (10), and Rick Nash can create plays better than perhaps anyone on the Redwings. HOWEVER, don't forget I am still a Redwings fan!
Most intense series: Flyers vs. Penguins - they are fighting almost the entire time. There have been some big hits and the players are getting chippy. They have one of the most heated rivalries in the game right now, as evidenced by last year's Eastern Finals.
Best Power Play: Vancouver Canucks - During the season, they were only 17th in the league in PP%. They were able to set up perfectly on each powerplay I saw and turned it into a shooting gallery. They had 1-2 guys own the space in front of the goalie and the other 3-4 cycled the puck freely until they were able to take the right shot. They ended up scoring all 3 goals in Game 3 on the powerplay
Best Passing: Detroit Redwings - I used to hate that the Redwings would always have to play finesse hockey and score pretty goals. We would get beat by tougher teams that would throw the puck at the net and jam it in. Our players now can maneuver the puck up the rink quicker than any other I've seen thanks to the two line pass rule changes. I also like seeing them create space by skating with a defender and stopping on a dime like a basketball player. Our success will hinge on whether Osgood can stay impressive and keep it together.
Most Questionable Decision: Washington Capitals - pulling Jose Theodore after Game 1. It seemed like a very risky move to pull him after 1 game in favor of a rookie. While Simeon Varlamov stopped all but 1 shot, it seems to me like it sends a message of desperation to the players. Seeing his performance in Game 2 and so far in Game 3, it looks like it may have paid off.
Best Goalie: Henrik Lundqvist - During the season, he was 4th in Wins and 11th in GAA. He looks very confident and the Rangers' success depends on their goalie more than almost any other team. The numbers would argue Luongo, but I didn't have a chance to see him make any impressive saves. His numbers for Game 3 are bad, but they aren't giving him a chance. He faced almost 30 shots through 2 periods and Sean Avery has "Sheed Syndrome" and can't stop getting penalties.
This is how I would like to see the rest of the playoffs go. Keep in mind, these are not predictions - just what I would like to see happen.
Eastern Conference
1.Boston Bruins def. 8.Montreal Canadiens
7.NY Rangers def. 2.Washington Capitals
3.NJ Devils def. 6.Carolina Hurricanes
4.Pittsburgh Penguins def. 5.Philadelphia Flyers
7.NY Rangers def. 1.Boston Bruins
This would be a great series - not just because of the Boston/New York matchup. I would love to see Sean Avery vs. Milan Lucic - both are aggressive and have occasionally thrown a cheap shot or two. I think there would a ton of great hits and fights.
4.Pittsburgh Penguins def. 3.NJ Devils
Crosby vs. Brodeur could be somewhat interesting. I don't really like the Devils nor do I like to root against them.
7.NY Rangers def. 4.Pittsburgh Penguins
I said sometime after the lockout that a NY/Detroit Stanley Cup Finals would bring a lot of attention to the game. I wouldn't mind watching a rematch from last year, but I would prefer to see someone else.
Western Conference
1.SJ Sharks def. 8.Anaheim Ducks
2.Detroit Redwings def. 7.Columbus Blue Jackets
3.Vancouver Canucks def. 6.St Louis Blues
4.Chicago Blackhawks def. 5.Calgary Flames
4.Chicago Blackhawks def. 1.SJ Sharks
I would only be rooting for Chicago because I don't want to see us having to play across the country for a second series in a row. We've had to do that in past years, and it has caught up with us. Plus, the Eastern Conference teams have an unfair advantage since they are all much closer geographically.
2.Detroit Redwings def. 3. Vancouver Canucks
Luongo is dangerous, but it appears they will lock up their first round very shortly. Could they be rusty? I hope we would lock this one up in 5 so we only have to make 1 trip to Vancouver.
2.Detroit Redwings def. 4.Chicago Blackhawks
A fitting rematch of the Winter Classic. I don't really think the Blackhawks stand a chance of seeing the Conference Finals except on TV.
Stanley Cup Finals: Wings over Rangers, just like I asked for a season or two ago. We have a villian to hate (Avery) and a matchup of two of the larger franchise bases in the sport.
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
Thoughts
I wanted to get my thoughts out for my own theraputic benefit and to let you know where I am coming from. I really am not writing it for sympathy or to be dramatic. I do appreciate the support you both have given me and I look forward to writing my next meaningless sports column.
To be honest, my mom's death hasn't sunk in. I am probably still in denial somewhat. I think little things will bring about the realization; Mother's Day, looking through old e-mails, family events, writing this post... When I got home, we all were very social to kind of help each other get through it. It is kind of weird, but I don't think I cried any point between when I got home and her funeral on Monday. During and after the funeral, I found myself occasionally staring at her photos for a few minutes at a time. I don't know what good that is going to do - it's not like all of a sudden it is going to start talking like in Harry Potter. I guess that I'm just trying to burn her image into my mind so I never forget the exact way she looks or the way she spoke. Luckily, I'm not to the point where I am trying to call her phone just to hear her voicemail message - that would just be unhealthy. I'm not really the kind of person who believes in the supernatural, but I keep looking for some kind of sign or communication from her. The morning she died, our bedroom door randomly opened. Normally, if it is not shut tight, the cats can nudge it open, but I didn't see them near the door. I thought later this could be some kind of "sign", but I found out later she passed away over an hour after that. I feel like I can better understand why people go to psychics or on that douchy John Edward show - they just want one last communication somehow. I guess it is because I don't feel like I got to say goodbye to her. I know in many cases, like a car accident or a heart attack, you don't have any notice. But everything happened so quickly. She was supposed to come visit us for the Super Bowl, but stayed home because she wasn't feeling well. The next week she was hospitalized and a week later she was diagnosed. I now hate the month of February, by the way. In Feb 06, my grandmother passed away and in Feb 08 her husband did. Anyway, about 3 weeks after her diagnosis was the last time she was really conscious. In retrospect, I feel a little bad that I wasn't there for EVERY weekend, but what can you do. I also feel a little bad that I lost hope for her improvement the weekend before she died. I know you should always try to be optimistic, but I also knew it was only a matter of time. Last Thursday may count as her official death, but she hadn't really been alive for a month. The last time I spoke with her, she was really showing signs of improvement, so trying to have that "last talk" seemed unnecessary and in poor taste since we were trying to be supportive. The next morning, she had very debilitating seizures and she wasn't really conscious. The weekend before she died, during a brief moment of coherence, she was able to smile at me and returned my "I love you".
My mom was kind of the glue for my family, so I know this is really going to change our relationship. My priest's sermon was excellent. I think it was the first time I have been able to completely focus on a sermon the whole way through in years. He did discuss God's will, but one of the specific things he said was "God's will is not to take the live of a 57 year old woman. God's will is not to give someone adrenal cancer." I really liked that part because some people pervert the concept by believing that EVERYTHING that happens is God's will. Why would he give us free will then? The free will that would allow us to believe in him or not?? I think that God has some kind of plan, but I don't know explicit I believe that plan is. Anyway, I have that mortal feeling that comes with these kind of tragedies, so I feel the motivation for change and improvement. I feel like I should be more charitable with my time, meet new people, and experience new things. Unfortunately, I don't think I really am going to do anything about it because when I come home from work, sometimes all I want to do is eat fast food and watch crappy tv. I don't know whether that is a pessimistic, defeatist, or realistic view. We knew in December that this year was going to be so monumental for my family. My sister is pregnant, I'm getting married, and my other sister has found her first full time job - her absolute dream job. It breaks my heart that she won't be there for any of it, but it will also help give us something to celebrate. I know this is going to be hard on my dad, but I am encouraged by his attitude. My physical distance from home had also created an emotional distance of sorts during the whole ordeal. I feel like I have been living a double life. Working, watching March Madness, going out with friends, and house hunting during the week versus dealing with everything at home on (most) weekends. Tomorrow, I will have to begin meshing that back together.
To be honest, my mom's death hasn't sunk in. I am probably still in denial somewhat. I think little things will bring about the realization; Mother's Day, looking through old e-mails, family events, writing this post... When I got home, we all were very social to kind of help each other get through it. It is kind of weird, but I don't think I cried any point between when I got home and her funeral on Monday. During and after the funeral, I found myself occasionally staring at her photos for a few minutes at a time. I don't know what good that is going to do - it's not like all of a sudden it is going to start talking like in Harry Potter. I guess that I'm just trying to burn her image into my mind so I never forget the exact way she looks or the way she spoke. Luckily, I'm not to the point where I am trying to call her phone just to hear her voicemail message - that would just be unhealthy. I'm not really the kind of person who believes in the supernatural, but I keep looking for some kind of sign or communication from her. The morning she died, our bedroom door randomly opened. Normally, if it is not shut tight, the cats can nudge it open, but I didn't see them near the door. I thought later this could be some kind of "sign", but I found out later she passed away over an hour after that. I feel like I can better understand why people go to psychics or on that douchy John Edward show - they just want one last communication somehow. I guess it is because I don't feel like I got to say goodbye to her. I know in many cases, like a car accident or a heart attack, you don't have any notice. But everything happened so quickly. She was supposed to come visit us for the Super Bowl, but stayed home because she wasn't feeling well. The next week she was hospitalized and a week later she was diagnosed. I now hate the month of February, by the way. In Feb 06, my grandmother passed away and in Feb 08 her husband did. Anyway, about 3 weeks after her diagnosis was the last time she was really conscious. In retrospect, I feel a little bad that I wasn't there for EVERY weekend, but what can you do. I also feel a little bad that I lost hope for her improvement the weekend before she died. I know you should always try to be optimistic, but I also knew it was only a matter of time. Last Thursday may count as her official death, but she hadn't really been alive for a month. The last time I spoke with her, she was really showing signs of improvement, so trying to have that "last talk" seemed unnecessary and in poor taste since we were trying to be supportive. The next morning, she had very debilitating seizures and she wasn't really conscious. The weekend before she died, during a brief moment of coherence, she was able to smile at me and returned my "I love you".
My mom was kind of the glue for my family, so I know this is really going to change our relationship. My priest's sermon was excellent. I think it was the first time I have been able to completely focus on a sermon the whole way through in years. He did discuss God's will, but one of the specific things he said was "God's will is not to take the live of a 57 year old woman. God's will is not to give someone adrenal cancer." I really liked that part because some people pervert the concept by believing that EVERYTHING that happens is God's will. Why would he give us free will then? The free will that would allow us to believe in him or not?? I think that God has some kind of plan, but I don't know explicit I believe that plan is. Anyway, I have that mortal feeling that comes with these kind of tragedies, so I feel the motivation for change and improvement. I feel like I should be more charitable with my time, meet new people, and experience new things. Unfortunately, I don't think I really am going to do anything about it because when I come home from work, sometimes all I want to do is eat fast food and watch crappy tv. I don't know whether that is a pessimistic, defeatist, or realistic view. We knew in December that this year was going to be so monumental for my family. My sister is pregnant, I'm getting married, and my other sister has found her first full time job - her absolute dream job. It breaks my heart that she won't be there for any of it, but it will also help give us something to celebrate. I know this is going to be hard on my dad, but I am encouraged by his attitude. My physical distance from home had also created an emotional distance of sorts during the whole ordeal. I feel like I have been living a double life. Working, watching March Madness, going out with friends, and house hunting during the week versus dealing with everything at home on (most) weekends. Tomorrow, I will have to begin meshing that back together.
Monday, April 06, 2009
Why Izzo Won't Leave?
"I feel like I have so much more to build," Izzo said on Sunday. "I love the Dukes, Carolinas, Kentuckys, Kansas. I'm not going to see that in my lifetime because they've done it for so many years, but I love aspiring to be those. Some of these guys have been doing things for 50 years. We're not there yet."
Sports Illustrated - Spartans, UNC playing to determine team of the decade
Sports Illustrated - Spartans, UNC playing to determine team of the decade
Sunday, April 05, 2009
Why we will lose to UConn
Note: This was obviously written last week. Since I had to return home this weekend, I didn't have a chance to post it. I felt it would be interesting to analyze my analysis, in italics, knowing how we won.
I feel like I am always the pessimist. I guess it is a security blanket so I can be excited when we win, but I can be right when we lose. Before today (last Tuesday), all I knew about UConn was that I thought Thabeet was overrated (he looked clueless about where to go defensively on many plays vs U-M), that Pitt OWNS them, and that you shouldn't ask Calhoun about his salary. I was surprised to discover that Thabeet may get the most press, but their other starters are what make them successful. Here's what scares me:
1. Unlike Louisville, they have been challenged. They have had to face good teams in the tournament with very different styles - and they've won each of them by greater than 7 points. I didn't realize the Big 10 style of play, when forced upon them, would stop Louisville. Although, they had previously lost to friggin Minnesota... at home! UConn, however, is 3-0 vs. the Big 10 with wins over U-M, Wisconsin, and Purdue.
While they had been challenged, our home town crowd propelled our team when they needed us most. I should have kept in mind that we proved we are different than U-M, Wisco, and Purdue by winning the Big 10 regular season by 4 friggin games!
2. Who can stop Adrien and Robinson?
I was very surprised to learn that Thabeet doesn't completely run this team. I think I am more concerned about their other forwards. Goran will have his hands full guarding Thabeet, so I am worried that will leave their other forwards open. Morgan hasn't been a factor lately, so I am worried we don't have anyone who can guard them.
Morgan stepped up and played to his full potential. Adrien and Robinson combined for 28 pts and 20 rebounds (almost half of their team total). However, I overlooked their lack of depth. Our bench played them fairly close with 33 pts and 14 rebounds.
3. We can't win the halfcourt game.
We beat Louisville with a strong inside presence and a halfcourt game. We outrebounded them and made them play at our pace, which ultimately frustrated them into submission. UConn's bigs are better, so I am worried they will have their way with us.
They really tested us in the beginning and kept working the ball inside with success. We ended up fouling them a ton and it made me worry. Ultimately our depth at forward, their foul shooting problems, and Izzo's strategy helped us win. Draymond (dancing bear???) Green had a great game. The aspect of our game that I enjoyed the most is that we won in a completely different fashion than against Louisville.
4. Assuming we do stop their forwards, can we stop their guards?
Their guards aren't quite as good as Louisville's, and they aren't as tall as USC's, but they can still be a threat if we focus on just their forwards.
Yes we can! Price did rack up 15 points, but it took 5/20 shooting to do it. Austrie and Walker only combined for 11 points. Their guards are decent, but they couldn't match up against our defense.
Looking Ahead...
I liked the Louisville game better, but we once again executed a sound strategy and played with passion against UConn. We had different guys take over the game (Green, Morgan, Lucious). I see North Carolina as having a strong half court game and a strong transition game, so it will be interesting to see what kind of gameplan Izzo creates. I think they need to come out early and take advantage of North Carolina's lapses in work ethic. I LOVE that everyone is still picking against us (just like they picked UConn, Louisville, and in many cases, Kansas). I think it is ignorant for analysts to be placing our success at Izzo's hands and overlooking the talent we have. North Carolina may be the best team in the tournament, but we have beaten two #1 seeds, three conference tournament champions, three regular season conference champions, and two teams that were ranked #1 for a total of 1/3 of the season. GO GREEN!
I feel like I am always the pessimist. I guess it is a security blanket so I can be excited when we win, but I can be right when we lose. Before today (last Tuesday), all I knew about UConn was that I thought Thabeet was overrated (he looked clueless about where to go defensively on many plays vs U-M), that Pitt OWNS them, and that you shouldn't ask Calhoun about his salary. I was surprised to discover that Thabeet may get the most press, but their other starters are what make them successful. Here's what scares me:
1. Unlike Louisville, they have been challenged. They have had to face good teams in the tournament with very different styles - and they've won each of them by greater than 7 points. I didn't realize the Big 10 style of play, when forced upon them, would stop Louisville. Although, they had previously lost to friggin Minnesota... at home! UConn, however, is 3-0 vs. the Big 10 with wins over U-M, Wisconsin, and Purdue.
While they had been challenged, our home town crowd propelled our team when they needed us most. I should have kept in mind that we proved we are different than U-M, Wisco, and Purdue by winning the Big 10 regular season by 4 friggin games!
2. Who can stop Adrien and Robinson?
I was very surprised to learn that Thabeet doesn't completely run this team. I think I am more concerned about their other forwards. Goran will have his hands full guarding Thabeet, so I am worried that will leave their other forwards open. Morgan hasn't been a factor lately, so I am worried we don't have anyone who can guard them.
Morgan stepped up and played to his full potential. Adrien and Robinson combined for 28 pts and 20 rebounds (almost half of their team total). However, I overlooked their lack of depth. Our bench played them fairly close with 33 pts and 14 rebounds.
3. We can't win the halfcourt game.
We beat Louisville with a strong inside presence and a halfcourt game. We outrebounded them and made them play at our pace, which ultimately frustrated them into submission. UConn's bigs are better, so I am worried they will have their way with us.
They really tested us in the beginning and kept working the ball inside with success. We ended up fouling them a ton and it made me worry. Ultimately our depth at forward, their foul shooting problems, and Izzo's strategy helped us win. Draymond (dancing bear???) Green had a great game. The aspect of our game that I enjoyed the most is that we won in a completely different fashion than against Louisville.
4. Assuming we do stop their forwards, can we stop their guards?
Their guards aren't quite as good as Louisville's, and they aren't as tall as USC's, but they can still be a threat if we focus on just their forwards.
Yes we can! Price did rack up 15 points, but it took 5/20 shooting to do it. Austrie and Walker only combined for 11 points. Their guards are decent, but they couldn't match up against our defense.
Looking Ahead...
I liked the Louisville game better, but we once again executed a sound strategy and played with passion against UConn. We had different guys take over the game (Green, Morgan, Lucious). I see North Carolina as having a strong half court game and a strong transition game, so it will be interesting to see what kind of gameplan Izzo creates. I think they need to come out early and take advantage of North Carolina's lapses in work ethic. I LOVE that everyone is still picking against us (just like they picked UConn, Louisville, and in many cases, Kansas). I think it is ignorant for analysts to be placing our success at Izzo's hands and overlooking the talent we have. North Carolina may be the best team in the tournament, but we have beaten two #1 seeds, three conference tournament champions, three regular season conference champions, and two teams that were ranked #1 for a total of 1/3 of the season. GO GREEN!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)